ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2026
Multifeature Ultrasound-Based Classification for Breast Lesions: A Comparative Study of PONS Image Enhancement Technology.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To overcome critical limitations of B-mode ultrasound in artificial intelligence diagnostics-including poor image quality and operator variability-by developing a multifeature framework that combines raw B-mode scans with 2 optimized representations (enhanced ultrasound and quality-improved ultrasound) for robust breast cancer classification. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 62,912 breast ultrasound scans (100%) from 688 patients (100%) at the Mayo Clinic (from December 01, 1989 to March 30, 2024). The study compared 3 deep learning architectures-graph convolutional networks (GCNs), masked autoencoders (MAEs), and multi-scale convolutional neural network (MSCNN)-using either standard B-mode inputs alone or combined with our enhanced features. Performance was evaluated through 3-fold cross-validation at the patient-level, with primary metrics including accuracy, area under the curve, F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: The multifeature approach reported substantial improvements across all metrics. For GCNs, multifeature integration increased accuracy from 0.508 to 0.845 and F1-score from 0.067 to 0.835. Sensitivity improved dramatically from 5.6% to 91.7%, while specificity showed a modest decrease from 85.7% to 79.0%. The MAE models showed different but complementary strengths, with multifeature integration improving accuracy from 0.775 to 0.873, F1-score from 0.785 to 0.822, and achieving perfect specificity (100%) while maintaining clinically acceptable sensitivity (71.1%). The MSCNN, included as a baseline convolutional architecture, showed minimal improvement with multifeature integration, with accuracy increasing slightly from 0.571 to 0.585 and specificity from 0.667 to 0.819. These results highlight the superior capability of GCNs and MAEs to effectively leverage multifeature information in breast ultrasound analysis compared with conventional MSCNN. Conclusion: PONS-enhanced multifeature ultrasound significantly improves breast cancer detection accuracy versus B-mode alone, offering complementary clinical solutions: GCNs for high sensitivity screening (91.7%) and MAEs for high-specificity diagnosis (100%). Results demonstrate clinical potential across diverse populations, with future work exploring enhanced fusion strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.