ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Unmasking the Clever Hans effect in AI models: shortcut learning, spurious correlations, and the path toward robust intelligence.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epistemic frontiers and the distinction between causality, information, and predictability in pattern recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The FAIRSCAPE AI-readiness Framework for Biomedical Research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Clever Hans (CH) effect is a historical analogy of a horse solving mathematical problems based on some cues, representing a critical failure in artificial intelligence (AI) systems, where models achieve higher performance by utilizing spurious correlations and artifacts presented in the datasets rather than relying on causal relationships or task-related features. This effect or phenomenon is prevalent across multiple domains of AI such as computer vision, natural language processing, medical imaging, and reinforcement learning. This review examines the Clever Hans effect, the conceptual foundation of spurious correlations, and current evaluation methods that obscure such behavior. We further survey state-of-the-art detection and mitigation strategies, focusing on both model-centric and data-centric techniques. Building on these insights, we propose a roadmap for robust AI development, which includes standard benchmarking, causal integration, human-in-the-loop auditing, and transparent policy frameworks. This study underscores that addressing the Clever Hans effect is not only necessary for technical robustness but also for the ethical and responsible deployment of AI systems in real-world, high-stakes environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.