ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
An improved YOLOv8n with multi-scale feature fusion for real time and high precision railway track defect detection.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Railway transportation is increasingly critical for modern urban and intercity mobility. However, the expanding scale and intensifying operational intensity of rail networks have elevated track defect detection to a key concern. Traditional inspection methods (manual, ultrasonic, eddy current, magnetic flux leakage testing) are limited by insufficient accuracy, low efficiency, or poor adaptability to complex environmental conditions. Methods: An enhanced defect detection framework based on an improved YOLOv8 algorithm was proposed, tailored for small targets and complex backgrounds. Three core improvements were integrated: 1) AVCStem module with variable convolution kernels to dynamically adapt to defects of different shapes and scales; 2) ADSPPF module using multi-scale pooling and multi-branch attention mechanisms to preserve fine-grained features across scales; 3) MSF module for enhanced multi-scale feature fusion via partial convolution and hierarchical feature alignment. Results and Discussion: Experiments on a real-world track defect dataset showed the proposed model achieved 90.2% detection precision, 90.2% mAP@0.5, and 73.2% mAP@0.5:0.95. Meanwhile, the model size was reduced to 5.2MB with 2.45M parameters. Comparative and ablation studies confirmed the complementary advantages of each module and the model's superior performance over existing lightweight detectors. The proposed model provides a robust, accurate, and efficient solution for real-time railway defect detection. It exhibits strong potential for deployment in edge AI devices and mobile inspection robots, addressing the limitations of traditional inspection methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.