Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584220›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Tackling fraud detection with an enhanced Kepler optimization and ghost opposition-based learning.

Ria H Egami, Amr A Abd El-Mageed, Mona Gafar, Amr A Abohany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ria H EgamiDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science and Humanity, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Amr A Abd El-MageedDepartment of Computer Science, College of Information Technology, Amman Arab University, Amman, Jordan.
Mona GafarDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information College of Engineering - Wadi Addawasir, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Amr A AbohanyFaculty of Computers and Information, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The growing prevalence of fraud and malware, fueled by increased online activity and digital transactions, has exposed the shortcomings of conventional detection systems, particularly in handling novel or obfuscated threats, class imbalance, and high-dimensional data with many irrelevant features. This underscores the need for robust and adaptive detection methodologies. Methods: This study proposes an advanced Fraud Detection (FD) methodology, BKOA-GOBL, that enhances the Binary Kepler Optimization Algorithm (BKOA) by integrating Ghost Opposition-Based Learning (GOBL) to improve Feature Selection (FS). The BKOA dynamically models gravitational attraction, planetary motion mechanics, and cyclic control to maintain a balance between exploration and exploitation. At the same time, the GOBL enhances broader search diversification and prevents early convergence, allowing the local optimum to be avoided. The Random Under-Sampling (RUS) technique is utilized to mitigate the class imbalance in fraud benchmarks. Results and discussion: Experimental validation is conducted on five real-world benchmarks, including the Australian, European, CIC-MalMem-2022, Synthetic Financial Transaction Log, and Real vs Fake Job Postings datasets, using k-Nearest Neighbors (

Indexed as

feature selectionfraud detectionghost opposition-based learning (GOBL)Kepler optimization algorithmmachine learningmetaheuristic algorithms

Identifiers

PMID41584220
PMCPMC12827784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.