Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584192›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Research on the influencing factors of sustainable fundraising in internet medical crowdfunding: based on dramaturgical theory.

Zihan Huang, Zhenyan Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zihan HuangSchool of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.
Zhenyan HanSchool of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amid global population aging and escalating healthcare costs, technology-enabled medical crowdfunding has emerged as a means to improve access to care. Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding its fairness, accountability, and long-term sustainability. Grounded in dramaturgical theory, this study analyzes data from 8,499 completed campaigns on China's Waterdrop Charity platform from 2018 to 2023. We conduct regression analyses of potential performance determinants to explore, across three dimensions, the key factors shaping medical crowdfunding performance. The results show that fundraising performance is positively associated with dynamic frontstage updates and with distinctive (non-formulaic) narratives; the experience of backstage charitable organizations amplifies the positive effect of dynamic updates; and donors' sharing/reposting behavior serves as a transmission mediator. Building on these findings, we offer short- and long-term recommendations to optimize performance, improve the medical crowdfunding model, and promote the sustainable development of philanthropy.

Indexed as

CharitiesCrowdsourcingFund RaisingInternetChinaHumanscharitable organizationsdramaturgical theoryfundraising performanceinfluencing factorsmedical crowdfundingsustainable development

Identifiers

PMID41584192
PMCPMC12827754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.