ReviewRSC advances2026
Rheological analysis in food processing: factors, applications, and future outlooks with machine learning integration.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Marine-derived alginate oligosaccharides as functional modulators for sodium reduction in coated frozen foods: molecular mechanisms, batter matrix engineering, and sensory compensation: a systematic review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Extruded Pseudocereal Snacks Mathematical Modelling Approaches for Prediction and Optimisation: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- ROS-Centered Transcriptomic Regulatory Networks Linking Salinity Stress, Antioxidant Defense and Processability Traits inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- High-Intensity Ultrasound Processing ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in bread making: Applications in quality control, formulation and sensory prediction.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
- Food characterization in the omics era: current advances, analytical approaches, and future perspectives.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food rheology serves as a critical tool for characterizing the flow and deformation properties of food, which directly impact its texture, taste, stability, and overall quality. The complex production environments and rapidly evolving market demands necessitate the integration of rheology with machine learning (ML) to accurately and effectively characterize and optimize the rheological properties of food. This review, with a focus on machine learning, examines texture analysis, including both large deformation rheology measurements, and small deformation rheology. It summarizes the factors influencing food rheology, emphasizing the interactions between key food components that affect rheological properties and the rheological characteristics of complex food systems. Furthermore, this review explores the detailed applications of combining rheology and machine learning in the food industry, as well as the associated challenges and future outlooks. ML has demonstrated significant efficacy in predicting and analyzing food rheology, despite the challenges posed by large datasets and intricate production conditions. The integration of ML with food rheology facilitates the analysis of food flow and deformation, optimization of product formulations, monitoring of production processes, and execution of sensory analysis. While ML-based approaches to rheology have advanced considerably in the context of food processing and quality assurance, substantial potential for further development remains.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.