Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584130›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2026

Permanent electrostatic moments through the lens of atoms: assessing variational Hirshfeld methods.

Maximilian van Zyl, Carlos Castillo-Orellana, Leila Pujal, Farnaz Heidar-Zadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maximilian van ZylDepartment of Chemistry, Queen's University 90 Bader Lane Kingston Ontario K7L-3N6 Canada farnaz.heidarzadeh@queensu.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-3460
Carlos Castillo-OrellanaDepartamento de Físico-Química, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de Concepción Concepción Chile.
Leila PujalDepartment of Chemistry, Queen's University 90 Bader Lane Kingston Ontario K7L-3N6 Canada farnaz.heidarzadeh@queensu.ca.
Farnaz Heidar-ZadehDepartment of Chemistry, Queen's University 90 Bader Lane Kingston Ontario K7L-3N6 Canada farnaz.heidarzadeh@queensu.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-050X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic multipoles are key components of many computational models; however, there is no unique method for computing them. This motivates our benchmark study to evaluate how accurately the atomic moments from variational methods approximate the molecular moments, offering insight into their ability to capture the underlying electron density. We show the chemical utility of higher-order atomic multipoles and demonstrate their conformational stability across diverse organic and inorganic molecules and protein fragments. We focus on the recently proposed Additive Variational Hirshfeld (AVH) method and compare its performance to two other popular variational Hirshfeld approaches, the Iterative Hirshfeld (HI) and Minimal Basis Iterative Stockholder (MBIS) methods, as well as the Charge Model 5 (CM5) and electrostatic potential fitted charges. We first show that commonly used integration grids can introduce significant numerical errors, undermining the reliability of quantitative comparisons of atomic dipoles and quadrupoles. We then demonstrate that while AVH charges may not always provide the most accurate approximation of molecular moments on their own, they outperform HI and MBIS in approximating the molecular quadrupole when atomic dipoles are taken into account. More severely, for HI and MBIS, the addition of atomic dipoles can sometimes increase the molecular quadrupole error. These findings suggest that AVH moments offer a more systematic improvement with increasing multipole order.

Identifiers

PMID41584130
PMCPMC12829589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.