Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584114›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2026

Out-of-distribution evaluation of active learning pipelines for molecular property prediction.

Tianzhixi Yin, Peiyuan Gao, Gihan Panapitiya, Emily G Saldanha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianzhixi YinPacific Northwest National Laboratory USA tianzhixi.yin@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0730-4309
Peiyuan GaoPacific Northwest National Laboratory USA tianzhixi.yin@gmail.com.
Gihan PanapitiyaPacific Northwest National Laboratory USA tianzhixi.yin@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-7600
Emily G SaldanhaPacific Northwest National Laboratory USA tianzhixi.yin@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8621-674X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active learning (AL) has been widely applied as a strategy to reduce the data requirements of training machine learning models. Such a strategy can be especially valuable in fields where data collection is costly or time-consuming, as is the case for molecular property data. In this study, we evaluate AL for molecular property prediction, focusing on the performance on out-of-distribution (OOD) data. This OOD evaluation framework mimics the scenario found in real-world applications but is understudied in the prior literature. In our study, we focus on the prediction of solvation energy from molecular structure and develop an AL framework based on prediction uncertainties derived from Evidential Deep Learning (EDL). We started by training our model on an in-distribution training dataset and progressively augmented it with molecules from an OOD dataset sampled from PubChem, selected either randomly or using the AL strategy. We further examined generalization capabilities of AL by beginning with a subset of the in-distribution dataset, intentionally chosen to reduce initial diversity. Our results indicate that EDL demonstrates an advantage over random sampling. To further understand the behavior of the AL algorithm, we performed analysis of how the similarity between the training dataset and the held-out dataset affects the AL performance and of the distributional differences in the types of molecules selected by random sampling and AL.

Identifiers

PMID41584114
PMCPMC12829442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.