ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
EUS-guided gastroenterostomy using a parallel enteric tube for luminal distension: Prospective multicenter procedural standardization (with video).
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04660695 (Serie de Casos Prospectiva de Gastroenteroanastomosis Guiada Por Ecoendoscopia Para la obstrucción al Vaciado gástrico en Neoplasias Avanzadas Mediante la técnica Del Drenaje Nasobiliar), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Serie de Casos Prospectiva de Gastroenteroanastomosis Guiada Por Ecoendoscopia Para la obstrucción al Vaciado gástrico en Neoplasias Avanzadas Mediante la técnica Del Drenaje Nasobiliar
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does endoscopic magnetic resonance imaging challenge EUS?Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) technique remains nonstandardized. We primarily aimed at standardizing parallel enteric tube (PET)-assisted EUS-GE, secondarily assessing reproducibility and outcomes. Methods: This prospective multicenter study included consecutive adult patients with unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction undergoing primary EUS-GE between August 2019 and April 2021. Hierarchical task analysis predefined procedural steps into tasks and subtasks. Subtasks were further categorized into essential (performed in all centers and in more than 85% of the procedures) or optional. Subtask methodology was considered established if performed similarly in all centers or variable if not. Procedure times, injected fluid volume, accessories, adverse events (AEs), and outcomes were recorded. Results: Seven endoscopists performed EUS-GE in 65 patients (50.8% male, median [interquartile range] age 77.5 [65.7-86.5] years). EUS-GE was categorized into 4 tasks (enteric tube placement, endoscope exchange, small bowel distention plus targeting, lumen-apposing metal stent placement) and 10 subtasks (7 essential, 3 optional). Five essential subtasks involved an established methodology (guidewire and PET placement, endoscope exchange, delivery system insertion, and lumen-apposing metal stent deployment).Technical and clinical success rates were 98.5% and 83.3%, respectively. AEs occurred in 10 (15.4%) patients. Success and AE rates were not different between expert and nonexperts. Procedure time was longer (35 [30.6-43.7] Conclusions: PET-assisted EUS-GE was standardized, identifying its key steps and technique variants. PET-assisted EUS-GE appears to be a reproducible procedure among advanced endoscopists with different levels of experience.(ClinicalTrials identification no. NCT04660695).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.