ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
The i-EUS consensus on EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: A 3-step modified Delphi approach.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: Current Evidence, Technical Considerations, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Malignant Double Obstruction: How Can Advanced Endoscopy Help?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Predictors of Biliary Drainage Dysfunction Following EUS-Guided Gallbladder Drainage for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study: GALLBLADEUS-2.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound in Biliopancreatic Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Effect of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) in Acute Cholecystitis Unfit for Surgery: Good Tidings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of Discordant Antibiotics on Outcomes After Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Analysis of 184 PCC Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
54 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has emerged as a viable alternative for patients with acute cholecystitis who are unfit for surgery. However, standardized guidelines for its indications, techniques, and management remain limited. The objective of this study is to develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for EUS-GBD in benign and malignant conditions, aimed at guiding clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes. Methods: A 3-step modified Delphi process was used by the Interventional Endoscopy and Ultrasound Group, involving multidisciplinary experts in gastroenterology, surgery, and radiology. Four task forces conducted systematic literature reviews and generated PICO (Patients, Interventions, Comparator, and Outcomes)-formatted clinical questions. Evidence was graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system, and consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement among panelists. Results: Twenty-two clinical questions were addressed, covering indications, timing, techniques, device selection, procedural aspects, and postprocedural care for EUS-GBD. Recommendations include the preferential use of EUS-GBD over percutaneous and transpapillary approaches in high-risk patients, early intervention in select cases, the use of lumen-apposing metal stents, and tailored postprocedural strategies. All recommendations were conditional, except for one strong recommendation in favor of EUS-GBD over other modalities, supported by moderate-quality evidence. Conclusions: This consensus offers a comprehensive, multidisciplinary guideline for the safe and effective use of EUS-GBD in clinical practice. These recommendations aim to standardize care and support future research in this rapidly evolving field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.