Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41584022›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Enhancing gastrointestinal stromal tumor risk stratification: A novel deep learning approach applied to EUS imaging.

Hui Qu, Fei Yang, Tingting Chen, Xiaoyu Cui, Siyu Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hui QuCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4086-0780
Fei YangDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7550-8675
Tingting ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5988-5054
Xiaoyu CuiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0585-9813
Siyu SunDepartment of Endoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Effective management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) requires accurate risk assessment due to their variable carcinogenic potential.This study aimed to improve GIST classification using a novel deep learning-based GIST risk prediction model based on EUS imaging modalities. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed EUS images of 341 patients diagnosed with GIST at a tertiary medical center between January 2016 and March 2022. Patients were selected based on specific criteria, including pathologic validation of surgical outcomes. The dataset allowed for the development and validation of a deep learning risk prediction model (DLRPM), a traditional risk prediction model (TRPM), and a combined risk prediction model (CRPM). Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and statistical analysis. Results: The efficacy of the 3 prognostic models (TRPM, DLRPM, and CRPM) for GIST classification was evaluated using a dataset consisting of 1019 EUS images from 341 patients. These models were developed using a training subset of 310 patients and subsequently validated in a defined group of 31 consecutive patients. Using multivariate logistic regression, TRPM showed an accuracy rate of 71.10%. Using a DenseNet-121 framework developed specifically for medical imaging, the DLRPM demonstrated superior predictive capabilities with an accuracy rate of 92.65%. The CRPM achieved a prediction accuracy of 90.32%. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed area under the curve values of 0.909, 0.932, and 0.843 for CRPM, DLRPM, and TRPM, respectively. However, comparative statistical evaluation between these models showed no significant differences in area under the curve. Conclusions: The novel DLRPM improved the accuracy of GIST risk stratification by EUS. CRPM is a promising method to integrate deep learning with traditional statistical methods, potentially optimizing clinical decision-making and patient outcomes in gastroenterological oncology.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningEUSGastrointestinal stromal tumorsRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41584022
PMCPMC12829681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.