ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
Enhancing gastrointestinal stromal tumor risk stratification: A novel deep learning approach applied to EUS imaging.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Delivery of Hydrogels: A Novel Strategy for Treating Early-Stage Gastrointestinal Tumors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prediction Model of Malignant Risk of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Based on Endoscopic Ultrasonography.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Case Report: Coexistence of a giant borderline phyllodes tumor of the breast and a contralateral fibroadenoma: a challenging case with clinical manifestations and PET-CT imaging mimicking advanced cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Effective management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) requires accurate risk assessment due to their variable carcinogenic potential.This study aimed to improve GIST classification using a novel deep learning-based GIST risk prediction model based on EUS imaging modalities. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed EUS images of 341 patients diagnosed with GIST at a tertiary medical center between January 2016 and March 2022. Patients were selected based on specific criteria, including pathologic validation of surgical outcomes. The dataset allowed for the development and validation of a deep learning risk prediction model (DLRPM), a traditional risk prediction model (TRPM), and a combined risk prediction model (CRPM). Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and statistical analysis. Results: The efficacy of the 3 prognostic models (TRPM, DLRPM, and CRPM) for GIST classification was evaluated using a dataset consisting of 1019 EUS images from 341 patients. These models were developed using a training subset of 310 patients and subsequently validated in a defined group of 31 consecutive patients. Using multivariate logistic regression, TRPM showed an accuracy rate of 71.10%. Using a DenseNet-121 framework developed specifically for medical imaging, the DLRPM demonstrated superior predictive capabilities with an accuracy rate of 92.65%. The CRPM achieved a prediction accuracy of 90.32%. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed area under the curve values of 0.909, 0.932, and 0.843 for CRPM, DLRPM, and TRPM, respectively. However, comparative statistical evaluation between these models showed no significant differences in area under the curve. Conclusions: The novel DLRPM improved the accuracy of GIST risk stratification by EUS. CRPM is a promising method to integrate deep learning with traditional statistical methods, potentially optimizing clinical decision-making and patient outcomes in gastroenterological oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.