ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2022
Ischemic Stroke Systems of Care in California: Evolution in the Organization During the Mechanical Thrombectomy Era.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insurance-Based Disparities in Stroke Center Access in California: A Network Science Approach.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optimized stroke systems of care enable access to timely care, including endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Stroke systems have likely evolved after publication of EVT benefit (2015). Our objective was to map the stroke patient transfer network in California in terms of EVT access and patient transfer patterns, and to examine changes after 2015. Methods: In this observational study, we identified all ischemic stroke encounters, transfers, alteplase use, and EVT procedures in California from 2010 to 2017. An established connection between any hospital pair was defined as the transfer of ≥2 patients between them. A 2-level logistic regression model assessed whether encounters were more frequently transferred to EVT-capable hospitals post-2015, adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors. Linear regression examined trends in key network characteristics over time, and interrupted time series regressions examined for changes post-2015. Results: Among 336 247 encounters, 3.4% were transferred, 9.3% received alteplase, and 2.3% underwent EVT. From 2010 to 2017 the proportion that were EVT treated increased (1.0%-4.3%; Conclusion: The California stroke network has been dynamic over time. Although most changes have been incremental, after the release of EVT trial data in 2015 changes in transfer patterns did lead to increased access to EVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.