ArticleInternational journal of telemedicine and applications2026
Enhancing the Diagnosis of Behçet's Disease Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study on Clinical Data From Saudi Arabia.
Article in International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing the Diagnosis of Behçet's Disease Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study on Clinical Data From Saudi Arabia.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behçet's disease (BD) is one of the most difficult diseases to diagnose in the field of rheumatic immune diseases because it is rare, has many different symptoms, and we do not know much about how it works. Instead of trying to make a direct clinical diagnosis, this study was set up as an exploratory investigation to find out more about BD and figure out which clinical and laboratory features are most important. To accomplish this, clinical data were gathered from 148 patients (76 with bipolar disorder and 72 with rheumatoid arthritis) at the Rheumatology Clinic of King Abdulaziz University. We used several machine learning (ML) algorithms, such as decision tree, bagging, random forest (RF), XGBoost, and support vector machines (SVMs), to see if they could learn patterns that set BD apart from other rheumatic diseases. We used three different methods to find out how important each feature was: built-in model importance, permutation-based analysis, and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values. The ML models worked well, with the RF getting the best accuracy (96.7%) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.0. XGBoost came in second with an AUC of 0.9985. The feature analysis showed that the results were partially in line with established diagnostic criteria (Japan, ISG, and ICBD), with oral ulcers being the most important feature. Overall, this study serves as an exploratory framework to deepen understanding of BD's distinctive characteristics and underlying feature interactions, offering insights that can inform future diagnostic support systems rather than serving as a diagnostic tool itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.