ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2025
X-ray contrast-adjustable 3D printing for multimodal fusion of microCT and histology.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Optimized Freeze-Dry Multimodal Workflow for Sequential Micro-CT Imaging, Histology, and Molecular Profiling: A Use Case in Human Liver Fibrosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- X-ray contrast-adjustable 3D printing for multimodal fusion of microCT and histology.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Phantoms and reference structures are essential tools for calibration and correlative imaging in pre-clinical and research applications of X-ray-based imaging. They serve as reference standards, ensuring consistency and accuracy in imaging results. However, generating individual phantoms often involves a complex creation process, high production costs, and significant time investment. Material and methods: Conic reference structures were 3D printed using a mixture of UV-curable resin and X-ray contrast agents. These structures were then embedded together with lung specimens of SARS-CoV-2-infected rhesus macaques in a methyl methacrylate-based solution. The polymerized blocks were scanned using propagation-based phase-contrast microCT, a method chosen for its superior ability to enhance contrast, especially in low-absorbing biological samples. Utilizing the conic reference structures, subsequently performed histological sections were co-registered into the 3D context of the microCT datasets. Results: The produced 3D printed models were highly visible in terms of contrast and detail in both imaging methods, allowing for a precise co-registration of microCT and histological imaging. Conclusions: The novel methodology of using contrast agents and resin in 3D printing enables the generation of customizable, contrast-specific phantoms and reference structures. These can be straightforwardly segmented from the embedding material, significantly simplifying and enhancing the workflow of multimodal imaging processes. In this study, 3D printed conic reference structures were effectively used to automate and streamline the precise multimodal fusion of microCT and histological imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.