ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2026
Evaluation of vaping cessation infographics among e-cigarette users: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods study.
Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis rise in vaping has become a significant public health concern. This mixed-methods study aims to assess the impact of vaping cessation infographics on different cessation motivation and gather feedback regarding how the infographic could be further improved.
methodsCurrent e-cigarette users completed an online cross-sectional survey in January 2022 through Prolific
resultsAmong 361 participants who were presented with the cessation infographic, 85.9% of them rated the infographic favorably. The liking of the cessation infographic (e.g. excellent vs fair/poor) was associated with greater perceived quit importance (incidence rate ratio, IRR=2.0, p<0001, quit commitment (IRR=1.6, p=0.005), and readiness to quit (IRR=1.9, p=0.001). The analysis of open-ended feedback resulted in several themes. Participants appreciated the detailed coping strategies, ease of understanding and accessibility, timelines and expectations, support and encouragement, comprehensive information, youth-focused content, and visual and structural appeals. Areas identified for improvement included health information and risks, design and presentation, target audience and content, support and resources, and user engagement.
conclusionsThis study highlights the need for tailored vaping cessation interventions. The infographic presented in this study resonated more with African American and Hispanic participants, who reported higher favorability than White participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.