ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2025
M-ECG: extracting heart signals with a novel computational analysis of magnetoencephalography data.
Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- M-ECG: extracting heart signals with a novel computational analysis of magnetoencephalography data.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) captures neural activity with high temporal and spatial resolution, but it typically discards other biopotentials, such as cardiac signals, as noise. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of extracting cardiac signals from MEG recordings using a novel algorithm to compute heart rate variability (HRV), a key autonomic biomarker. Using the Brainstorm MEG auditory dataset and the Open MEG Archive resting-state sample dataset, we developed an approach that isolates MEG-derived electrocardiogram (M-ECG) using either independent component analysis or MEG reference sensors. This algorithm identifies physiologically valid R-peaks, removes outliers, and corrects aberrant RR intervals to enable accurate HRV computation. We evaluated HRV derived from M-ECG against HRV derived from simultaneously recorded electrocardiogram (ECG) using time-domain and frequency-domain measures, along with non-parametric statistical tests and similarity metrics. Results revealed strong temporal and spectral agreement between M-ECG and simultaneously recorded ECG signals, including alignment across HRV bands and minimal bias in RR intervals. These findings highlight the potential of M-ECG for non-invasively assessing autonomic function using existing MEG data. Incorporating HRV into MEG studies could advance our understanding of brain-heart interactions and provide new diagnostic and prognostic insights, particularly in neurological disorders involving autonomic dysregulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.