ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Exploration of 'generational' peer-led CPR training in the Australian community using blended learning approaches: a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Chest Compression Depth, Rate, and Spring Resistance with "Quality CardioPulmonary Resuscitation" (QCPR) Scores in a Manikin Model.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Balancing perfectionism with expansion in community CPR training.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: A pilot randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility and relative effectiveness of a community CPR train-the-trainer model using either a traditional face-to-face or blended learning approach (video supported face-to-face training with the provision of a multimodal 'CPR lesson card' containing visual prompts and a QR linked training video). A 'generational' recruitment strategy was used to evaluate knowledge degradation across a series of peer-led training episodes. Methods: Participants ( Results: In total, 115 CPR assessments were conducted (57 intervention, 58 control) following episodes of intergenerational peer-led training. Pass rates were 96.5 % (55/57, 95 % CI: 87.9-99.6 %) in the intervention group and 75.9 % (44/58, 95 % CI: 62.8-86.1 %) in the control group (Fisher's Exact Conclusion: Peer-to-peer CPR training in the community is feasible through several generations of knowledge transfer. The use of a simple multimodal training aid appears to enhance performance beyond the first generation and may provide a scalable, cost-effective adjunct to traditional CPR training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.