ArticleAdvanced nanobiomed research2025
Characterization of a Bioprinted Anticancer Cell Therapy System Generated with Continuous Liquid Interface Production.
Article in Advanced nanobiomed research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for systemic diseases and localized injuries.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- High-Resolution 3D Bioprinted Hydrogel Scaffolds Enable Sustained Intraperitoneal Cell Delivery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anticancer cell therapies have remarkable clinical potential yet fail to reach the clinic due to poor delivery. 3D bioprinting (3DBP) can be leveraged for generating cell therapy delivery devices, where the biomaterial system acts as a protective matrix to stabilize cells after implantation. Continuous liquid interface production (CLIP), an additive manufacturing technology, has several unique features that make it a suitable platform for 3DBP of cell-laden scaffolds. However, the feasibility CLIP bioprinting and efficacy of CLIP-bioprinted cell/matrix therapies have not yet been explored. In this work, we demonstrate the utility of CLIP for cell therapy 3DBP with a simple gelatin methacrylate-based resin and anticancer drug-secreting fibroblasts as a model therapy against recurrent glioblastoma. We demonstrate that CLIP enables rapid, consistent production of cell-laden scaffolds, and cells maintain their viability and tumor-killing efficacy in vitro post-printing. Importantly, we proved that bioprinted cells survive longer in vivo than directly injected cells, and that this effect may correspond to better survival outcomes in a mouse model of glioblastoma resection. This study is the first to utilize CLIP for 3DBP of composite devices containing anticancer cell therapies, providing a crucial foundation for developing highly refined cell therapy delivery devices in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.