ArticleMethodsX2026
Analyzing the mahakam river water quality using the geographically weighted panel regression model.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study discusses the geographically weighted panel regression (GWPR) model. GWPR is an extension of geographically weighted regression model, designed for spatially heterogeneous panel data. In this study, GWPR model is applied to panel data on biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in Mahakam River water 2022-2024. The model is estimated at each spatial location using a fixed effects model (FEM) as the global model, with temporal effects addressed through a demeaning transformation. All statistical analyses and spatial processing are conducted using R software, GNU Octave, QGIS, and Google Earth. This study aims to map factors influencing Mahakam River water BOD using GWPR model. The results indicate that GWPR outperforms FEM, with AIC = -60.6419,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.