ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Thirty Years of the Biology of Spermatozoa: The Rise and Future of an Evolutionary Paradigm.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thirty Years of the Biology of Spermatozoa: The Rise and Future of an Evolutionary Paradigm.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the early 1970s, Geoff Parker recognised that because females frequently mate with multiple males, competition for fertilizations will impose significant sexual selection on males and their ejaculates. Post-mating sexual selection has since developed into a significant evolutionary paradigm, in no small part fostered by the biennial meeting of the Biology of Spermatozoa (BoS) community. BoS celebrated its thirtieth anniversary in 2025, prompting reflection on the development of the discipline and its future. The paradigm has shifted from one focused predominantly on competition among males for fertilizations to a holistic appreciation of the role of females and ova in determining fertilisation success, and the interacting effects of males and females on fertilisation outcomes. The field has transitioned from a phenotypic focus to one in which omics are yielding unprecedented insight into the biology of sperm, ova and male and female reproductive fluids that affect fertilisation dynamics. Understanding sperm biology has become a strongly interdisciplinary venture, fostered by the BoS meetings. Key discoveries over the last 30 years are highlighted and areas for future development identified. The history of this field highlights the critical role played by small, focused meetings and workshops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.