ReviewACS environmental Au2026
Mechanistic Insights and Design Strategies for Hydrogel/Aerogel Sorbents in Remediation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.
Review in ACS environmental Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Green and Ultrafast Preparation of TiOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Insights into the Possible Impact of PFAS on Phosphatidylcholine Metabolism and Membranes through Molecular Dynamics Simulations.ACS environmental Au · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been used for several decades in various sectors, including aerospace, construction, the military, and the production of goods, among others. This widespread use has significantly contaminated water bodies globally. Several government agencies and organizations are trying to develop advanced technologies such as oxidation, membrane filtration, adsorption, and ion-exchange resin to capture these chemicals and thus mitigate their impacts. Adsorption has proven to be a highly attractive method for removing PFAS, involving activated carbon, silica, bioadsorbents, anion-exchange resin, hydrogels, and nonion exchange polymers. Among different adsorbents, hydrogels are the most effective adsorbents for removing these forever chemicals due to their highly porous structure, reuse and regeneration ability, and ease of functionalization with specific groups for effective binding with PFAS molecules. Keeping in view their tremendous potential, this Review critically reviews the potential of underexplored hydrogel/aerogels-based sorbents developed from synthetic polymers as well as biopolymers. The use of different cross-linkers, co-monomers, inorganic and organic additives, and surface functionalization techniques on the PFAS removal ability of the resulting hydrogels/aerogels under varying pH, background species concentration, PFAS concentration, and temperature was thoroughly discussed. Furthermore, the underlying adsorption mechanisms (ionic, hydrophobic, hydrogen bonding, and F-F interactions) of hydrogels and aerogels for PFAS adsorption from a molecular perspective were also examined. Finally, the challenges inhibiting the large-scale production of these adsorbents and the scope of ionic fluorogel and thermosensitive hydrogels have also been thoroughly reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.