ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2026
Case report of stiff - person syndrome and literature review.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Currently, there is no objective evaluation method to measure muscle tension and therapeutic effects in patients with stiff person syndrome (SPS). We aimed to investigate objective evaluation criteria for diagnosis and treatment. We used needle electromyography (EMG) to record muscle electrical signals before and after the diazepam drug trial to diagnose a patient with SPS. Method: We present a patient who was misdiagnosed as having an "anxiety state" for more than a decade because of recurrent tension, worry, and intermittent fear, resulting in generalized muscle stiffness and even falls. Conventional needle EMG was performed on the limbs and axial muscles. The changes in muscle electrical signals before and after diazepam drug trials were recorded. Results: EMG revealed a significant increase in spontaneous motor unit potentials in the patient's limbs and axial muscles at rest. After intravenous injection of diazepam, the spontaneous motor unit gradually reduced and ultimately disappeared. Based on these results, anti-antibody testing for SPS was performed one week later. The results revealed a high titer of anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 antibodies (GAD65-Abs) in serum, while anti-amphiphysin antibodies were negative. The diagnosis was confirmed as SPS. Conclusion: Needle EMG is a convenient tool that can provide diagnostic direction for SPS before genetic testing, enabling clinicians to select specific genes for testing and thereby shortening the time required for clinical examination and diagnosis for patients. Additionally, it can be used to verify the efficacy of experimental medications during testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.