ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Short-term clinical efficacy of five-step manipulation under anaesthesia combined with arthroscopic shoulder surgery for adhesive capsulitis.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the short-term efficacy of arthroscopic capsular release combined with five-step manipulation under anaesthesia vs. five-step manipulation under anaesthesia alone for adhesive capsulitis. Methods: This retrospective study included 66 patients assigned to arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) plus five-step manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) ( Results: One week and one month post-operatively, VAS scores in the two groups were similar ( Conclusion: Compared with simple five-step MUA, the combination therapy of five-step MUA and ACR provides superior pain relief and higher ASES functional scores at 6 months after surgery. However, operation time, postoperative hospitalisation days and hospitalisation costs correspondingly increase. Due to the small sample size and short clinical observation time, further follow-up is needed for long-term efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.