Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583845›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025

Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection following primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jiashun Li, Zhen Liu, Zheng Wang, Deyu Li, Heng Zhang, Shuo Hao, Qingxue Zhu, Maihemuti Yakufu, Ainikaer Abulaiti, Abuduwupuer Haibier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Differential analysis of gut microbiome in patients with periprosthetic joint infection, aseptic failure, and osteoarthritis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiashun Li *Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Zhen Liu *Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Zheng Wang *XinJiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Deyu Li *Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Heng ZhangXinJiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Shuo HaoFifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Qingxue ZhuPeople's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Maihemuti YakufuSixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Ainikaer AbulaitiSixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Abuduwupuer HaibierSixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a severe and devastating complication following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), leading to higher morbidity and implant failure. However, existing evidence regarding its risk factors remains inconsistent. Method: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Chinese Journal Database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed) were searched for primary studies from the database inception to August 2025. Data were managed with EndNote X9 software, meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4, infection risk was analyzed using STATA 18, and the comprehensive incidence rate of PJI was analyzed using R 4.5.1. Results: A total of 1,569 studies were identified, of which 20 were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis including 20 studies analyzed eight risk factors: longer operation time (OR = 9.10, 95% CI: 7.66-10.80), obesity (OR = 13.95, 95% CI: 12.06-16.14), male gender (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.80-3.95), diabetes (OR = 2.98, 95% CI: 2.27-3.92), longer hospital stay (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.38-2.16), use of immunosuppressants (OR = 5.76, 95% CI: 2.77-11.98), hypoalbuminemia (OR = 6.24, 95% CI: 4.00-9.73), and underlying systemic inflammatory disease (OR = 3.47, 95% CI: 1.92-6.27). All identified risk factors were associated with an increased risk of developing PJI after primary TKA. Conclusion: The meta-analysis confirmed that longer operative time, obesity, male gender, diabetes, longer hospital stay, use of immunosuppressants, hypoalbuminemia, and underlying systemic inflammatory disease are risk factors for PJI after primary TKA. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide Level II evidence (according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria) for the identified risk factors.

Indexed as

meta-analysisperiprosthetic joint infectionPJIrisk factorsTKAtotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41583845
PMCPMC12823960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.