ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025
Complex Labral Tears Are Not Predicted by Number of Preoperative Dislocations nor Time From Injury to Surgery in Patients Receiving Arthroscopic Anterior or Posterior Labral Repairs.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether complex glenoid labral tears (i.e., those involving >120°of the glenoid labrum) are related to demographics, injury patterns, and surgical procedures/timing in patients undergoing primary arthroscopic labral repair. Methods: This retrospective chart review included patients with traumatic shoulder instability who underwent primary arthroscopic labral repair between 2012 and 2020. Patients with atraumatic multidirectional instability, clinical ligamentous laxity, or previous shoulder surgeries were excluded. Variables analyzed included age, sex, body mass index, contact sports participation, number of dislocations (<1, 1, 2, >2), direction of instability, labral tear size, time to surgery, number of anchors, and concomitant procedures. Complex labral tears involved >120° of the glenoid rim. Cohorts of "simple" anterior or posterior tears (<120°) were used for comparison. Statistical analyses used Results: In total, 477 patients (364 simple labral tear patients - 280 anterior and 84 posterior; 113 complex labral tear patients) met inclusion criteria (mean age: 27 years; range: 14-72 years). In all tear size groups, it was more common to have >2 dislocations than ≤2 dislocations (120° = 48.6%, 240° = 40.4%, 360° = 83.3%), but these differences were not statistically significant ( Conclusions: Complex glenoid labral tears did not correlate with the number of preoperative instability events, direction of instability, time to surgery, or previously cited factors such as contact sports or BMI in patients arthroscopically treated for shoulder instability. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative cohort.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.