ReviewJournal of migration and health2026
Challenges to healthcare access for migrants in transit: A scoping review.
Review in Journal of migration and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reframing trauma-informed care for refugee and (im)migrant health systems: from interpersonal practice to structurally embedded care.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Innovative pathways for sustainable health financing for migrants and refugees in Iran: a stakeholder and social network analysis approach.BMJ public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Migrants in transit face numerous health challenges which are further exacerbated by barriers to accessing healthcare. Understanding these barriers is essential for designing effective health interventions and policies that ensure equitable healthcare access for this population. This scoping review aims to investigate the barriers and the existing health policies that complicate healthcare access for migrants in transit and to recommend alternatives to improve access. Methods: This review scoped 26 papers between 2011 and June 2024, including grey literature, using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. The databases searched included Medline, Migration Research Hub, Science Direct, Biomed Central, OECD, and third-sector websites. Results were thematically coded using inductive and deductive analysis. Results: 16 peer-reviewed articles and 11 grey literature reports were included in this review. 69% of research was centred in the low- and middle-income European countries, and 80% of primary research focused on healthcare provider and civil organization perspectives. 46% of the studies directly analysed the barriers to healthcare, which were categorized into dimensions of acceptability, availability, affordability and accessibility. Only 23% of articles discussed policies and potential solutions, but there were no studies evaluating implementation of these policies or solutions. Conclusion: Despite the growing body of literature on migrant health, significant gaps remain in understanding the extent of healthcare challenges faced by migrants in transit. Future research is needed to inform policy, practice, and the development of more effective healthcare systems for migrants in transit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.