Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583778›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

A systematic review and meta-analysis of motivational climate and youth sport outcomes: examining a hierarchical effects model.

Yimeng Gu, Long Cheng

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yimeng GuSchool of Wushu, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Long ChengSchool of Wushu, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Although the beneficial impact of motivational climate on adolescent sport participation is well-established, key questions remain unresolved regarding its hierarchical mechanism and the relative efficacy across climate types. This study applies a meta-analytic approach to reveal the deep structural mechanism of motivational climate to guide theoretical improvement and provide empirical support for optimal implementation in physical education. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched the Web of Science and CNKI databases for studies published between 2015 and 2025. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using JBI critical appraisal tools. A total of 177 studies, yielding 334 independent effect sizes, were included in the final analysis. A random-effects model was used to conduct the main meta-analysis, moderator analyses, and publication bias tests. Results: The meta-analysis revealed a moderate overall positive association between motivational climate and youth outcomes ( Conclusion: The pattern of association between motivational climate and adolescent outcomes is consistent with a psychological-to-behavioral hierarchical model. This underscores motivational climate as a key "psychological architect" that influences longer-term behavior and performance indirectly through internal psychological states. The study highlights aspects of this motivational climate by not only demonstrating its positive influence, but also unmasking its structural pathways and offering us promising climate models with some educational significance. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251155621, identifier: CRD420251155621.

Indexed as

adolescentsmeta-analysismotivational climatephysical activityphysical education class

Identifiers

PMID41583778
PMCPMC12823993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.