ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Exploring the impact of ICT interaction on students' creative thinking across performance levels: an explainable AI perspective.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study uses the PISA 2022 ICT questionnaire to examine how students' ICT interaction behaviours in digital environments predict creative thinking across low, medium, and high performance levels (Class 0-2). Using multi-class classification models with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), we identify key ICT-related predictors spanning information retrieval, digital content creation, media evaluation, collaborative communication, and emotional response, with largely nonlinear and interactive effects. Results show that ICT influences creative thinking less through usage frequency than through the intentionality and complexity of ICT engagement and its sociocultural alignment. High-performing students tend to display more functional and strategic ICT behaviours, whereas low-performing students more often show superficial, recreational, or potentially unethical patterns, with emotional regulation, media literacy, and digital ethics emerging as salient factors. These findings clarify performance-specific ICT-creativity profiles and support targeted digital literacy interventions tailored to students at different ability levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.