ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
From fear to innovation: the mediating roles of curiosity and grit in the relationship between fear of academic failure and creative problem-solving among Chinese undergraduates.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fear of Academic Failure (FoAF) is a common emotional experience among undergraduates and is often associated with differences in academic performance and problem-solving. While the relationship between fear and academic outcomes is well-documented, less is known about how FoAF relates to creative problem-solving (CPS). This study explores the roles of curiosity and grit as mediators in this relationship. Methods: A cross-sectional, correlational study was employed with a sample of undergraduate students from three universities in Putian City, China. Participants completed self-report measures assessing FoAF, Curiosity, Grit, and CPS. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling to test the direct and indirect associations of FoAF on CPS via curiosity and grit. Findings: The results revealed that FoAF was modestly positively associated with CPS (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.091, 0.274]). Curiosity (β = 0.118) and grit (β = 0.176) also showed positive associations with CPS, and both mediators showed significant indirect associations. The pattern of coefficients indicates that the FoAF-CPS association via grit was comparatively stronger than via curiosity. Conclusion: This study offers a deeper understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying CPS among undergraduate students. While curiosity sparks initial engagement, grit underpins the ability to solve problems creatively. These findings suggest that cultivating grit in students, particularly those facing academic challenges, may be more effective than focusing solely on curiosity. By emphasizing grit alongside curiosity, educational interventions can better support students in navigating academic obstacles and developing the problem-solving skills necessary for success in their studies and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.