Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583745›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Categorization of echocardiograms by humans and pigeons.

Odysseus R P Orr, Victor M Navarro, Edward A Wasserman, David Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Odysseus R P OrrDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, United States.
Victor M NavarroSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Edward A WassermanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, United States.
David OuyangKaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Categorizing medical samples is a difficult and time-consuming task that directly impacts patient outcomes. Recent technological advancements may hold the key to improving medical professionals' diagnostic accuracy. One of these advancements is EchoNet-Dynamic, a convolutional neural network that segments echocardiograms-ultrasound videos of the heart-producing a red overlay onto the left ventricle, the area of the heart relevant to diagnosis. We investigated the potential for EchoNet-Dynamic's segmentation to aid naïve non-clinician humans and pigeons in their diagnosis of cardiac function. Humans were trained to categorize either segmented or non-segmented echocardiograms as depicting normal or abnormal heart function. Then, roughly half of the subjects in each group were tested with videos of the opposite type they were trained with. We found that more humans trained with segmented videos adequately learned the task than those trained with non-segmented videos; they also learned more quickly, exhibited higher accuracies at the end of training, and reliably generalized to non-segmented videos during testing. Despite these apparent benefits, there was no general improvement in the accuracy of humans trained with non-segmented videos when testing with segmented videos. Pigeons, trained with segmented videos, successfully learned the task. However, unlike humans, they failed to generalize their learning to non-segmented videos, even after a fading procedure was employed. We conclude that EchoNet-Dynamic's segmentation is an effective visual aid that enhances learning and enables reliable transfer to non-segmented videos for humans, and provides a means of learning what otherwise might have been an incredibly difficult task for pigeons.

Indexed as

category learningcomparative cognitionmedical perceptiontwo-alternative forced choicevisual aids

Identifiers

PMID41583745
PMCPMC12827666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.