ReviewIndian journal of psychological medicine2026
Lights, Camera, Stigma? Bollywood's Depiction of Mental Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.
Review in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of the Review: Bollywood (Hindi cinema) is a powerful global medium that shapes public attitudes toward mental healthcare. This scoping review systematically maps and characterizes the portrayal of mental health professionals (MHPs) in contemporary Bollywood films to identify dominant stereotypes, representational patterns, and potential gaps in representation. Collection and Analysis of Data: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A systematic search of online databases identified Hindi-language films released between 2011 and 2024. Inclusion criteria were applied to select films featuring MHP characters. Data from each portrayal were systematically charted to analyze demographics, professional competence, ethics, and narrative function. Thirty-five films featured 42 distinct MHP portrayals. The findings revealed a consistent pattern of negative representation. MHPs were presented as minor, unnamed characters with ambiguous professional status. MHPs were frequently portrayed with clinical incompetence (>70%) and major ethical violations (>73%), with these harmful stereotypes appearing persistent over the decade. A culturally specific pattern emerged where supernatural narratives frequently invalidate MHP expertise. Psychotherapy, though depicted, was often caricatured or undermined, and treatment outcomes were typically ineffective. A significant gap was identified concerning the lack of nuanced or positive MHP role models. Conclusions: The systematic misrepresentation of MHPs in Bollywood portrayals risks reinforcing harmful stereotypes, trivializing professional care, and discouraging help-seeking in a country already facing a vast treatment gap. This review highlights an urgent need for the film industry to move beyond caricature and to create more accurate, ethical, and humanizing portrayals that can contribute positively to public mental health literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.