ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Head Elevation, Cerebral Venous System, and Intracranial Pressure: Review and Hypothesis.
Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered Neurocritical Care Management of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Following Changed Positions of the Zero-Reference Points for Intracranial and Arterial Pressure Measurement.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Transcranial Color Doppler for Assessing Cerebral Venous Outflow in Critically Ill and Surgical Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Jugular Venous Catheterization is Not Associated with Increased Complications in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Intracranial pressure dynamics, cerebral autoregulation, and brain perfusion after decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: is there a role for invasive monitoring?Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- High-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - Beyond Guidelines.Neurologic clinics · 2025Review
- Intraocular Pressure Equations Utilizing Aqueous Fluid Flow and Flow Facility in the Steady-State and Time-Dependent Domains.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Neurological manifestations of encephalitic alphaviruses, traumatic brain injuries, and organophosphorus nerve agent exposure.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Mobilization phases in traumatic brain injury.Acute and critical care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Facilitation of venous outflow from the brain is largely believed to be responsible for the beneficial effect of head elevation on intracranial pressure (ICP). However, the impact on cerebral perfusion pressure can be deleterious. Although the adverse effect of obstructing venous outflow in the setting of intracranial hypertension is well documented, the converse (improvement with augmented drainage) has not been demonstrated. Our hypothesis is that the effect of active augmentation of cerebral venous outflow on ICP, although unknown, could be potentially beneficial under conditions of intracranial hypertension. Methods: Published literature was perused to ascertain known relationships between head elevation, ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure, and the cerebral venous system. Results: Head elevation benefits ICP control in intracranial hypertension from improved venous outflow via various networks and craniospinal cerebrospinal fluid displacement; but patients on the severe spectrum have a high likelihood of experiencing cerebral perfusion pressure decline especially beyond 30°. In addition, the interaction between autoregulation, compliance, head elevation, ICP pulse amplitude, cerebral perfusion pressure, and ICP becomes increasingly dyssynchronous in the severely affected brain. Although the detrimental effects of Conclusion: There could exist a potential role for targeted sagittal sinus venous aspiration in favorably influencing control of increased ICP conditions, without significant risk to cerebral perfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.