ArticleArthroplasty today2026
If I Had a Hammer: The Role of Automated Impactors in Transforming Total Hip Arthroplasty Procedures and Recovery.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Impaction during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is physically demanding and places considerable stress on surgeons, contributing to fatigue and musculoskeletal injury. Automated impactor systems have emerged as a potential solution to reduce these physical demands. This study explores the dual benefits of such a system in THA, focusing on both surgeon well-being and patient recovery outcomes. Methods: The research combines wearable sensing technology and mobile sensing applications across two complementary studies. The Surgeon Exertion arm of the study assessed surgeon exertion and well-being during THA procedures performed with a traditional mallet vs an automated impactor system, measuring physiological stress markers and recovery indicators with the use of wearable sensing technology. The Postoperative Patient Outcomes arm evaluated patient recovery outcomes, leveraging mobile sensing technology to passively collect real-world data on physical activity, pain, and mood pre- and post-THA. Results: Surgeon Exertion results indicate significantly lower physiological stress markers and improved sleep quality for the surgeon when the automated impactor system was used for the day's surgical cases compared to the traditional mallet (IMPACTOR: 108.8 bpm vs MALLET: 121.2 bpm; Conclusions: The integration of an automated impactor system in THA surgeries offers significant benefits for both surgeon well-being and patient outcomes, including improved hip function, greater daily mobility, and increased walking distance. The study's innovative use of mobile sensing and wearable technologies provides a robust framework for understanding the impacts of surgical innovations in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.