ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Pattern Recognition: Call for Functionally Aware AI for Anatomical Illustration.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- RAPID CTA versus JLK LVO for large vessel occlusion detection: a pragmatic comparison of performance and common pitfalls.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurovascular surgery: advancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Current Stroke Solutions Using Artificial Intelligence: A Review of the Literature.Brain sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rapid detection of intracranial arterial occlusion in patients with ischemic stroke is important to facilitate timely reperfusion therapy. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of neurologists and radiologists against Methods: Adult patients who presented to a single comprehensive stroke center over a 5-month interval with clinical suspicion of ischemic stroke and who underwent multimodality imaging with Results: The assessors read scans from 500 patients (49.6% men). The positive LR of Conclusions: Experienced readers of acute stroke imaging can identify LVOs and MVOs with higher accuracy than
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.