Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583580›Full record

ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Postmarket Surveillance of Neuroendovascular Devices.

Marie K Luff, Art Sedrakyan, Sameer A Ansari, Adnan H Siddiqui, David S Liebeskind

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie K LuffDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles CA.
Art SedrakyanDepartment of Population Health Sciences Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY.
Sameer A AnsariDepartment of Radiology Neurology, and Neurological Surgery Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL.
Adnan H SiddiquiDepartments of Neurosurgery and Radiology Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo Buffalo NY.
David S LiebeskindDepartment of Neurology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5109-8736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular devices have catalyzed a global industry for advanced technologies such as flow diverters and stent retrievers. Though adoption of these devices has skyrocketed over the past 30 years, the regulatory landscape for real-world monitoring is constantly under revision. Postmarket surveillance is an area of Medical Device Regulation that monitors how devices perform in the real world after regulatory approval. This area of research is underdeveloped globally, with most surveillance relying on passive adverse event data collection from health care systems. The US Food and Drug Administration has not yet established a comprehensive postmarket surveillance strategy for neuroendovascular devices. Postmarket clinical surveillance data are rare; only 4 mandated 522 postmarket neuroendovascular trials exist, and 4 of 14 endovascular registries have published results per ClinicalTrials.gov. The European Union 2017 Medical Device Regulation describes a comprehensive regulatory strategy to address postmarket surveillance, yet it has faced difficult implementation due to resource constraints and concerns such as increased costs and reliance on foreign devices and regulators. More than 50% of manufacturers are planning portfolio reductions, with 33% of the devices from these manufacturers planned for discontinuation. As of April 2022, >85% of 500 000+ previously certified devices were without new certification. In this article, we describe the current regulatory landscape for postmarket surveillance and support the need for a comprehensive, cost-efficient postmarket strategy for neurovascular devices while proposing several solutions and considerations. An effective postmarket strategy has numerous benefits, such as promoting patient safety, expanding real-world data collection, and increased efficiency for approving future devices.

Indexed as

aneurysmendovascularmedical deviceneuroendovascularregulationstrokesurveillance

Identifiers

PMID41583580
PMCPMC12778473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.