ArticleMachine learning: science and technology2025
FDDM: Unsupervised Medical Image Translation with a Frequency-Decoupled Diffusion Model.
Article in Machine learning: science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review of Diffusion Models for Medical Image-Based Diagnosis: Methods, Taxonomies, Clinical Integration, Explainability, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A universal medical imaging modality translation model in brain and head-and-neck radiotherapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diffusion models have demonstrated significant potential in producing high-quality images in medical image translation to aid disease diagnosis, localization, and treatment. Nevertheless, current diffusion models often fall short when it comes to faithfully translating medical images. They struggle to accurately preserve anatomical structures, especially when working with unpaired datasets. In this study, we introduce the Frequency Decoupled Diffusion Model (FDDM) for MR-to-CT conversion. The differences between MR and CT images lie in both anatomical structures (e.g., the outlines of organs or bones) and the data distribution (e.g., intensity values and contrast within). Therefore, FDDM first converts anatomical information using an initial conversion module. Then, the converted anatomical information guides a subsequent diffusion model to generate high-quality CT images. Our diffusion model uses a dual-path reverse diffusion process for low-frequency and high-frequency information, achieving a better balance between image quality and anatomical accuracy. We extensively evaluated FDDM using public datasets for brain MR-to-CT and pelvis MR-to-CT translations. The results show that FDDM outperforms other generative adversarial network (GAN)-based, variational autoencoder (VAE)-based, and diffusion-based models. The evaluation metrics included Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM), and Dice similarity coefficient (DICE). FDDM achieved the best scores on all metrics for both datasets, particularly excelling in FID, with scores of 25.9 for brain data and 29.2 for pelvis data, significantly outperforming other methods. These results demonstrate that FDDM can generate high-quality target domain images while maintaining the accuracy of translated anatomical structures, thereby facilitating more precise/accurate downstream tasks including anatomy segmentation and radiotherapy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.