ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2026
Biomechanical assessment of the maxillary position after Le Fort I osteotomy using rapidly biodegradable miniplates and screws: an experimental study.
Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Absorbable plates have become increasingly common in orthognathic surgery. Multiple plate types are available, including poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and PLLA/polyglycolic acid (PGA), the latter of which is expected to be absorbed more rapidly. However, the application of these materials in Le Fort I osteotomy is not clearly established. In this study, the strength and biomechanical properties of PLLA and PGA-co-PLLA absorbable plates were compared using an in vitro LeFort I osteotomy model. Basic physical strength was evaluated using tensile, bending, indentation, and handling test s. Biomechanical evaluations using the Le Fort I osteotomy model included anterior (with 0, 3, and 5 mm anterior movement) and occlusal (with a 2 mm downward vertical movement) indentation tests. In terms of basic physical properties, PLLA showed significantly higher strength than that of PGA-co-PLLA in tensile, bending, and indentation tests. In handling tests, PGA-co-PLLA demonstrated superior performance. In biomechanical evaluations, no significant differences were observed between PLLA and PGA-co-PLLA in anterior or occlusal indentation testing. Despite the greater basic physical strength of PLLA than PGA-co-PLLA, there were no significant differences between the two plate types in the biomechanical evaluation of Le Fort I osteotomy. These findings provide a basis for plate selection in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.