Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583406›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

The SAFEST Study: Survey on Antiplatelets in Flow Diversion for Aneurysm Endovascular Treatment.

Sophia Hohenstatt, Dominik F Vollherbst, Thanh N Nguyen, Zhongrong Miao, Mai Duy Ton, Hiroshi Yamagami, Adam A Dmytriw, Gabriele Maliandi, Martin Bendszus, Jessica Jesser and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy in the New Flow Diversion Era.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sophia HohenstattDepartment of Neuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-3948
Dominik F VollherbstDepartment of Neuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany.
Thanh N NguyenDepartment of Neurology Boston Medical Center Boston.
Zhongrong MiaoDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.
Mai Duy TonStroke Center Bach Mai Hospital VNU-University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hanoi Medical University Ha Noi Vietnam.
Hiroshi YamagamiDepartment of Stroke Neurology National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Adam A DmytriwNeuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital & Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Gabriele MaliandiDepartment of Cardiology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany.
Jessica JesserDepartment of Neuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany.
Markus A MöhlenbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Flow diversion has emerged as a promising treatment strategy for intracranial aneurysms, yet the influence of antiplatelet therapy on treatment outcomes remains uncertain. Regional and institutional variability in antiplatelet regimens further complicates treatment standardization. This survey aimed to investigate common practices of antiplatelet medication usage in flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms worldwide. Methods: An anonymous online survey explored antiplatelet therapy regimens in flow diverter implantations, including agent selection, dosing, and duration. The survey was distributed through international neurointerventional societies and mailing lists. Results: Participants included 442 from 53 countries, revealing that most practitioners agree on using dual antiplatelet therapy, with 67% combining low-dose aspirin with clopidogrel. However, alternative P2Y12 inhibitors are increasingly being used with the main reasons for preferring ticagrelor (21%) over prasugrel (10%) being its availability and bleeding risk, whereas the main reason for using prasugrel over ticagrelor is patient compliance. Resistance testing for antiplatelet agents was conducted by 62% of survey respondents, with the VerifyNow system being the most common method. Strategies to manage resistance included dose escalation (17%) and switching (83%) to alternative agents. Interest in participating in future trials investigating antiplatelet therapy duration and dual antiplatelet therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy was high (77% and 58%, respectively). Conclusion: Antiplatelet treatment strategies following flow diversion procedures vary globally, with a growing interest in alternative agents and a willingness to participate in future trials. Standardization efforts and further investigation are warranted for optimizing neurointerventional outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID41583406
PMCPMC11864745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.