Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583404›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Lesion Volume as a Predictor for Return to Work After Endovascular Treatment: A 4-Year Prospective Cohort Study.

Gisle Berg Helland, Mona Kristiansen Beyer, Brian Anthony B Enriquez, Hege Ihle-Hansen, Håkon Ihle-Hansen, Stein Andersson, Esten Høyland Leonardsen, Helle Stangeland, Bettina Ùjhelyi, Guri Hagberg and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gisle Berg HellandDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-7733
Mona Kristiansen BeyerInstitute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Brian Anthony B EnriquezDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Hege Ihle-HansenDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Håkon Ihle-HansenDepartment of Medicine Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Drammen Norway.
Stein AnderssonDepartment of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Esten Høyland LeonardsenDepartment of Psychology University of Oslo Oslo Norway.
Helle StangelandDivision of Clinical Neuroscience Department of Research and Innovation Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Bettina ÙjhelyiDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Guri HagbergDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Hanne Flinstad HarboDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Anne Hege AamodtDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Einar August HøgestølDepartment of Neurology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are no known objective biomarkers for predicting return to work (RTW) in ischemic stroke survivors. This study aims to explore the predictive utility and defines a cutoff value of lesion volume on RTW after endovascular treatment. Methods: We included patients aged <65 years undergoing endovascular treatment at Oslo University Hospital between January 2017 and May 2019. Employment status was obtained at both baseline and a 4-year follow-up. Stroke lesion volumes were segmented using magnetic resonance imaging scans 24 hours after endovascular treatment. Logistic regression models were conducted to assess the impact of lesion volume on RTW status at follow-up, adjusted for patients' characteristics, stroke-related factors, and treatment. We calculated the receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the optimal lesion volume cutoff. Machine learning regression models were used to assess the predictive abilities of baseline clinical and imaging variables for RTW. Results: Of the 109 individuals treated, 81 (74%) were employed at baseline. Among these, 60 completed 4-year follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging available for stroke lesion segmentation and were included in the analyses. Mean age at stroke onset was 51.8 years (range, 23.5-64.9 years), and 50% were female. Median lesion volume was 18 mL (interquartile ranges, 45-47 mL). After 4 years, 34 (57%) had successfully RTW. The odds for not RTW increased by 5% for every 1 mL increase in lesion volume (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.11]; Conclusion: Lesion volume was the most robust predictor of RTW 4 years after endovascular treatment. Our findings suggest that a cutoff of 29 cm

Indexed as

endovascular proceduresfollow‐up studiesimaging biomarkerischemic strokemachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingreturn to work

Identifiers

PMID41583404
PMCPMC11864733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.