ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024
Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Final Infarct Core from CT Perfusion Data: A Comparison to the Clinical Standard.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the management of acute ischemic stroke, computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is used to define the ischemic core and penumbra to estimate tissue fate after reperfusion therapy. The core/penumbra dichotomy uses single-value thresholds, which potentially discards valuable data and oversimplifies the complexity of core and penumbral estimation. Advancing the dichotomous CTP output to a probability model has several advantages such as more sophisticated modeling of pathophysiology, supporting reader interpretation, and assessing a greater range of available data to estimate tissue fate. Methods: In this retrospective study, we developed a CTP probability model to move away from single perfusion thresholds to estimate tissue fate. All patients from the International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry database had baseline CTP and were included in the current study if they had a large vessel occlusion that recanalized fully after thrombectomy and had follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging. Data were split into training, validation, and testing groups. Training and validation cohorts were used to develop a deep learning model in project MONAI (Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence) and performance metrics were derived from the testing set. Results: In total, 243 patients were included in the study. The Attention U-Net was the best performing deep learning model, producing the best prediction of follow-up infarct core on the test set (n = 48): mean diverse counterfactual explanations score = 0.430±0.213, mean area under the curve = 0.765±0.095; better than the single-value thresholding with a diverse counterfactual explanations scoreof 0.247±0.167 (paired Conclusion: The deep learning probabilistic CTP model outperformed the current clinical standard, providing a more accurate core estimate than single-threshold-based measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.