Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583393›Full record

ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Participant Diversity in Stroke-Related Medical Device Trials: Historical Context and Ongoing Challenges.

Mary E Fuhlbrigge, John D Carroll, Nicole R Gonzales, Karen D Orjuela

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mary E FuhlbriggeUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora CO.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9655-4960
John D CarrollDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Colorado Aurora CO.
Nicole R GonzalesDepartment of Neurology University of Colorado Aurora CO.
Karen D OrjuelaDepartment of Neurology University of Colorado Aurora CO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite an acknowledgment of the ethical and clinical importance of recruiting diverse populations into clinical trials, there is a continued underenrollment of patients with diverse demographic characteristics within the field of neurology and more specifically, in stroke-related device trials. Efforts on the part of the US Congress, the National Institutes of Health, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services over the past several decades have attempted to increase trial participant diversity with varying success. This historical context provides an important lens for analyzing diversity proposals and their bearing on device trials in the field of stroke neurology. Despite economic and logistical challenges, recruitment of appropriately diverse clinical trial populations through policy change and community engagement is critical to continuing to advance health equity goals.

Identifiers

PMID41583393
PMCPMC11864736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.