ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
Efficacy and safety of indwelling double-pigtail stents after endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis complicated with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: A follow-up study.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pancreatic organoids and organoid-on-a-chip platforms: from disease modeling to precision therapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is a significant cause of pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) recurrence in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). Effective management strategies for DPDS are crucial to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of indwelling double-pigtail stents (DPSs) after endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) in patients with NP complicated with DPDS, focusing on the impact on PFC recurrence rates and readmission. Methods: We conducted a 1-year follow-up of patients with NP complicated with DPDS who underwent drainage or/and EN from June 2015 to November 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether with DPS after removal of the metal stent. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of stent type (7Fr and 10Fr DPS) after EN. The primary outcome was to assess the 1-year PFC recurrence rate. Results: Seventy-eight patients with DPDS were included in the study. Recurrence was seen in 7/30 (23.3%) patients with DPS replacement and 34/48 (70.83%) without DPS replacement within 1 year of discharge; the difference was statistically significant. Additionally, the readmission rate significantly decreased in the group with DPS (10.00% Conclusion: In patients with NP complicated with DPDS, the replacement and long-term indwelling of DPS can reduce the recurrence rate and hospital readmission rate. Furthermore, the 7Fr DPS size may offer better outcomes in terms of recurrence and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.