ArticleCureus2025
Familial Cognitive Dissonance in the Context of Brain Death: A Case Report and Theoretical Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain death, defined as the irreversible cessation of all brain and brainstem functions, is legally and medically recognized as death, yet families often struggle to accept it. We report the case of a 65-year-old man admitted to the intensive care unit with a massive intracerebral hemorrhage. Despite maximal interventions, he progressed to brain death confirmed by neurological examination and apnea testing. While the patient's wife and daughter gradually accepted the diagnosis, his son reacted with disbelief, anger, and persistent denial, rejecting the medical declaration of death and complicating end-of-life communication. This case illustrates how such reactions can be interpreted through cognitive dissonance theory. Recognizing these mechanisms provides a novel clinical insight into the need for structured, empathetic, and repeated communication strategies that explicitly address cognitive dissonance, particularly for family members in emotionally dominant roles, to reduce conflict, improve acceptance of brain death, and support ethically complex end-of-life discussions, including those related to organ donation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.