ArticleCureus2025
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Wrap-Around Extension Block Pinning Technique for Bony Mallet Fingers.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Open Double Mallet Lesion of the Ring Finger with Concomitant Little Finger Fracture: A Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and objectives Mallet finger fractures with substantial dorsal fragments often require surgical intervention, particularly when associated with distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) subluxation. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of a modified fixation method, the wrap-around extension block pinning technique, designed to enhance dorsal fragment compression and reduce K-wire migration. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients treated with the wrap-around technique at a single tertiary hand surgery center over five years. Seventeen patients with a minimum follow-up of four months were included. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed using Crawford's criteria, and the results were benchmarked against historical controls (Çapkın et al., Jain et al., and the surgical and conservative subgroups of Yoon et al.). Graphical analyses were used to visually explore the potential trend between the mean cohort age and outcome distributions. Results Seventeen patients (mean age, 39 years) were analyzed. The combined excellent/good rate was 41.1% (7/17), and no postoperative complications occurred in this cohort (0%; 0/17), with no cases of hardware failure or loss of reduction. Comparative descriptive analysis suggested an inverse trend between cohort mean age and the proportion of excellent/good outcomes across the analyzed studies, with younger published cohorts demonstrating higher excellent/good rates. The outcome distribution in the current series most closely resembled that of the surgically treated subgroup in Yoon et al., which also included older patients and more complex fracture patterns. Conclusion The wrap-around extension block pinning technique provided exceptionally stable fixation without complications but did not yield superior functional outcomes compared with the historical results of standard extension block pinning. Our observations suggest that age, fracture severity, and immobilization duration may be more strongly associated with functional recovery than the specific fixation constructs. While further comparative studies are needed, the technique offers a reliable alternative when construct stability is a priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.