Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583280›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Ki-67 Proliferation Marker in Various Biological Variants of Ameloblastoma.

Gaurav Salunkhe, Anu S Issac, Rohit Jha, Deepak Kolte, Padma P Datla, Rahul Vc Tiwari, Heena Dixit, Seema Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gaurav SalunkheDepartment of Oral Pathology, Dr GD Pol Foundation's Yerala Medical Trust Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Anu S IssacDepartment of Pathology, Dr. Somervell Memorial CSI Medical College and Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram, IND.
Rohit JhaDepartment of Oncology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Deepak KolteDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Padma P DatlaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, GSR Institute of Craniofacial Surgery, Hyderabad, IND.
Rahul Vc TiwariDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RKDF Dental College and Hospital, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan University, Bhopal, IND.
Heena DixitDepartment of Blood Cell, Commisionerate of Health and Family Welfare, Hyderabad, IND.
Seema GuptaDepartment of Orthodontics, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Ameloblastoma remains one of the most enigmatic and locally destructive benign odontogenic tumors, posing significant therapeutic challenges owing to its variable biological behavior across histopathological subtypes. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the proliferative activity using Ki-67 labelling index (LI) among solid/multicystic ameloblastoma (SMA), unicystic ameloblastoma (UA), and desmoplastic ameloblastoma (DA), and to correlate the findings with their known clinical aggressiveness and recurrence potential. Materials and methods Thirty archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks of ameloblastoma were retrieved. The ameloblastoma cases comprised 12 SMA (predominant plexiform pattern), 10 UA, and 08 DA cases. Four or five micrometer sections were subjected to immunohistochemical staining using a ready-to-use mouse monoclonal anti-Ki-67 antibody. Three blinded oral pathologists independently counted Ki-67-positive tumor nuclei in three hot spot high-power fields (×100), and the labelling index was calculated as the percentage of positive nuclei per 1,000 tumor cells. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test; p <0.05 was considered significant. Results Ki-67 LI was significantly higher in SMA (mean 75.44 ± 18.58%, range 20.56-93.89%), followed by UA (22.81 ± 4.81%), and lowest in the DA (11.7 ± 15.44%; p=0.001). Post-hoc analysis confirmed significantly higher expression in SMA than in UA (p=0.001) and DA (p=0.001), with no significant difference between UA and DA (p=0.353). Excellent interobserver agreement was achieved (ICC=0.99). Conclusion SMA exhibited markedly higher proliferative activity than UA and DA, explaining their greater local aggressiveness and recurrence risk. The Ki-67 LI is a reliable and reproducible immunohistochemical marker that can aid risk stratification, treatment planning, and prognostic prediction in ameloblastoma.

Indexed as

ameloblastomabiological variationimmunohistochemistryki-67 antigenproliferation

Identifiers

PMID41583280
PMCPMC12828288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.