Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583264›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

How Are Pedagogical Practices Within Medical Education Being Adapted for Autistic Students?

Alex Harker, Suhail Tarafdar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex HarkerGeneral Internal Medicine, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Cardiff, GBR.
Suhail TarafdarWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism can be defined as a neurodevelopmental learning difficulty characterised by deficits in social communication, the presence of restrictive interests and repetitive behaviours. The aim of this systematic review was to explore pedagogical practices and identify interventions that would have an impact on autistic medical students' experiences. A search strategy was undertaken on databases relevant to medical education. Included studies pertained to autistic medical students and/or postgraduate autistic doctors and concerned factors that could have implications on pedagogical practice. A quality appraisal was conducted, and a narrative synthesis was employed to produce the final report. Seven articles were included in the final synthesis, with three deemed high risk of bias. Four themes were identified. Findings that improved experiences included raising understanding and awareness through training, recognition and language usage and individualised practical adaptations. Emphasis was placed on role modelling from autistic medical educators/clinicians to facilitate insight into strengths and weaknesses. Taking an alternative view on empathy and considering co-creation of empathy teaching sessions (faculty and autistic students) would positively impact not only autistic medical students but also their neurotypical peers. Potential strategies have been proposed to bolster the effectiveness and equitable nature of current pedagogical practice in medical education. The more tenable propositions suggested include altering language use and co-creation of empathy teaching sessions. The remaining proposals may not currently be plausible within the United Kingdom given cost and feasibility factors when considering their implementation. Further evaluation is needed when considering the global context. The paucity of literature pertaining to this topic indicates that further research is warranted.

Indexed as

autisminequitymedical educationpedagogical practicesstrategies

Identifiers

PMID41583264
PMCPMC12824980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.