ReviewCureus2025
How Are Pedagogical Practices Within Medical Education Being Adapted for Autistic Students?
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism can be defined as a neurodevelopmental learning difficulty characterised by deficits in social communication, the presence of restrictive interests and repetitive behaviours. The aim of this systematic review was to explore pedagogical practices and identify interventions that would have an impact on autistic medical students' experiences. A search strategy was undertaken on databases relevant to medical education. Included studies pertained to autistic medical students and/or postgraduate autistic doctors and concerned factors that could have implications on pedagogical practice. A quality appraisal was conducted, and a narrative synthesis was employed to produce the final report. Seven articles were included in the final synthesis, with three deemed high risk of bias. Four themes were identified. Findings that improved experiences included raising understanding and awareness through training, recognition and language usage and individualised practical adaptations. Emphasis was placed on role modelling from autistic medical educators/clinicians to facilitate insight into strengths and weaknesses. Taking an alternative view on empathy and considering co-creation of empathy teaching sessions (faculty and autistic students) would positively impact not only autistic medical students but also their neurotypical peers. Potential strategies have been proposed to bolster the effectiveness and equitable nature of current pedagogical practice in medical education. The more tenable propositions suggested include altering language use and co-creation of empathy teaching sessions. The remaining proposals may not currently be plausible within the United Kingdom given cost and feasibility factors when considering their implementation. Further evaluation is needed when considering the global context. The paucity of literature pertaining to this topic indicates that further research is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.