ReviewCureus2025
Gender Bias and Diagnostic Delays in Young Women: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-based disparities in cardiovascular disease: Can polysocial screening mitigate the risk?American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Beyond a Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient and Caregiver Expectations About Emergency Department Visits Amid Uncertainty.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- The illusion of empowerment: commercializing women's health in the digital age.Health promotion international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gender bias continues to influence diagnostic pathways for young women, contributing to delayed recognition of serious neurological, cardiovascular, autoimmune, and pain-related conditions. Symptoms such as visual disturbances, chest discomfort, fatigue, and multisystem complaints are frequently misattributed to stress, psychosocial factors, or benign causes. This narrative review synthesises existing literature on diagnostic disparities affecting young women across multiple specialities. Evidence highlights longer diagnostic intervals for conditions such as multiple sclerosis, optic neuritis, acute coronary syndromes, lupus, and chronic pain syndromes. Contributing factors include the under-recognition of sex-specific symptom profiles, historical male-centred research models, and cognitive heuristics that disproportionately categorise women's symptoms as functional or anxiety-related. International comparisons reveal narrower diagnostic gaps in Scandinavian systems with structured equity frameworks, whereas data from Australia and other regions demonstrate persistent triage and investigation differences that disadvantage young women. The consequences of delayed diagnosis include irreversible organ damage, increased long-term disease burden, psychological distress, and reduced quality of life. This review emphasises the need for bias-aware clinical assessment, improved education on sex-based differences, and system-level strategies to ensure that young women's symptoms are recognised and investigated promptly. Addressing diagnostic gender bias is essential for improving patient outcomes and achieving equity within modern healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.