Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583255›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Factors Contributing to Achilles Tendon Re-rupture: A Systematic Review.

Abimbola O Kolawole, Temidun O Kolawole, Robert H Ablove

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abimbola O KolawoleMedicine, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, USA.
Temidun O KolawoleMedicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, USA.
Robert H AbloveOrthopedic Surgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is common among active adults, yet factors associated with re-rupture remain inconsistently reported. Because available studies differ substantially in design, follow-up duration, and outcome definitions, this systematic review evaluates which treatment strategies and patient-related factors are associated with Achilles tendon re-rupture without overstating precision. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Library (2004-October 23, 2024) for studies reporting re-rupture after acute ATR. Eligible studies included adults with clinically and/or imaging-confirmed ATR and evaluated associations between baseline characteristics, treatment approaches, or rehabilitation strategies and subsequent re-rupture. Owing to substantial heterogeneity, data were synthesized narratively, and crude numerical ranges were reported descriptively. Study quality was assessed with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tools. Eleven studies (44,557 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Reported re-rupture rates varied widely across treatment strategies, reflecting heterogeneous follow-up periods, definitions of re-rupture, and surgical techniques. Higher recurrence rates reported with specific techniques, such as the Tenolig percutaneous system, were derived from small, non-randomized studies and should be interpreted cautiously. More broadly, available evidence within the included studies did not consistently identify a superior standard repair method. Early weight-bearing (EWB) and functional rehabilitation, when examined, did not demonstrate a clear association with higher re-rupture frequency, though protocols varied substantially. Baseline factors such as male sex and pre-existing tendinopathy were observed more frequently among patients who sustained re-rupture, but findings were inconsistent across studies. Re-rupture after ATR appears to occur within a multifactorial context involving patient- and treatment-related characteristics, but current evidence does not clearly favor one contemporary repair strategy over another. Early functional rehabilitation was commonly implemented without higher observed re-rupture frequencies within structured protocols. Future studies should use consistent definitions, standardized rehabilitation pathways, and more uniform outcome reporting to improve comparability.

Indexed as

achilles ruptureachilles tendinopathypreventative measuresre-rupturesports participation

Identifiers

PMID41583255
PMCPMC12824815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.