Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583250›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Practical Strategies for Integrating Ad Hoc Simulated Participants in Emergency Medicine Education: A Faculty Guide.

Kei U Wong, Charles Lei, Sara M Hock, Tina H Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kei U WongEmergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Rutgers University New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA.
Charles LeiEmergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, USA.
Sara M HockEmergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
Tina H ChenEmergency Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standardized patients, simulated participants, and simulated patients (SPs) are essential in emergency medicine (EM) training, offering both structured and psychologically safe opportunities for learners to develop communication and interpersonal skills. With upcoming changes to the American Board of Emergency Medicine Certifying Exam, the importance of SP-based education in residency training has further increased. Yet many programs face various constraints that preclude consistent access to professionally trained SPs, including financial, scheduling, availability, or other resource limitations. As a result, many EM educators are increasingly turning to ad hoc SPs, here defined as individuals recruited from local networks who have not undergone formal SP training. This paper draws on the collective experience of EM educators who have worked extensively with both professionally trained and ad hoc SPs across undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education settings, as well as best practices recommended by the Association of Standardized Patient Educators. We outline practical recommendations for recruiting, preparing, deploying, and supporting ad hoc SPs for programs with limited access to professionally trained SPs.

Indexed as

ad hoc spemergency medicine educationsimulated participantssimulated patientssimulated personssimulation-based curriculumsimulation in medical educationstandardized patientsteaching by simulationteaching in emergency medicine

Identifiers

PMID41583250
PMCPMC12830043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.