Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583248›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Microscope and the Tubular System: Trend or Real Benefit in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disc Herniation?

Antonio Sosa Najera, Alejandro Ceja, Raul Huato Reyes, Tommy C Junior Quispe Pari, Carlos Morales Valencia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio Sosa NajeraNeurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Hospital Angeles Morelia, Morelia, MEX.
Alejandro CejaVascular Neurosurgery, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Mexico City, MEX.
Raul Huato ReyesNeurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Hospital Angeles Morelia, Morelia, MEX.
Tommy C Junior Quispe PariNeurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Hospital Angeles Morelia, Morelia, MEX.
Carlos Morales ValenciaNeurological and Spine Surgery, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of the microscope in minimally invasive spinal surgery has contributed to improvements, as it provides the surgeon with a better view of the surgical field, due to the magnification, depth, and better illumination of anatomical structures of vital importance for the patient's functionality, and also supports the ergonomics of the patient and surgeon within the surgical act. Tubular microdiscectomy is a minimally invasive procedure that works through a small incision, with less injury to the paraspinal muscles, less tissue retraction, and, therefore, less probability of producing postoperative infections. It can be applied in different pathologies of the lumbar spine and is an effective surgical technique for the treatment of lumbar disc pathology and spinal stenosis, with the benefits of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Indexed as

disc herniationherniated nucleus pulposuslumbar spinal stenosisspinal canal stenosisspine microsurgeryspine stenosisspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID41583248
PMCPMC12828289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.